I’m a big believer in looking at long-run trends, particularly whether countries are experiencing convergence or divergence with regards to per-capita economic output. Poor nations normally should grow faster than rich nations, so we can learn a lot when we see exceptions to this rule based on several decades of data.
I think the answer to these questions is obvious, for what it’s worth. Today, let’s consider another example. Mike Bird of the U.K.-based Economist tweeted about how the United Kingdom is diverging from Australia.

Since Australia and the United Kingdom have similar levels of economic liberty, some people speculate the divergence we’re seeing has a lot to do with regional economic performance. That makes some sense. Many of Australia’s trading partners are fast-growing nations in East Asia. More specifically, those countries have been buying a lot of natural resources from Australian producers. The United Kingdom, by contrast, has a lot of trade with Europe’s slow-growing nations. The above chart is based on household disposable income. So I decided to also check the Maddison database to see whether there were similar changes to per-capita GDP. The charts don’t match exactly, but the trends are similar (I added the Czech Republic since it was mentioned in the tweet).

So is this the end of the story? Not exactly. My next step was to add Switzerland to see whether trade with Europe dooms a nation to divergence. Lo and behold, it is diverging with Australia, but in a positive way. It’s getting comparatively richer over time, just the opposite of what we see in the United Kingdom.
So maybe the real lesson is that there’s more prosperity – and the right kind of divergence – in nations with greater levels of economic liberty. And Switzerland surely is a good role model for policy.
I’ll close with a couple of caveats. The level of economic liberty is important, but it does not tell us everything. Likewise, the level of growth in neighboring nations is important, but it does not tell us everything. Moreover, I normally like looking at four or five decades of data rather than just 20 years. All that being said, I’m definitely not optimistic about the long-run outlook in the United Kingdom.
Comment
|
December 28th, 2022
Convergence and Divergence for the United Kingdom
If the UK wants to converge its disposable per capita income to the richer nations of the world it will need a good policy in economic liberty.
I’m a big believer in looking at long-run trends, particularly whether countries are experiencing convergence or divergence with regards to per-capita economic output. Poor nations normally should grow faster than rich nations, so we can learn a lot when we see exceptions to this rule based on several decades of data.
I think the answer to these questions is obvious, for what it’s worth. Today, let’s consider another example. Mike Bird of the U.K.-based Economist tweeted about how the United Kingdom is diverging from Australia.
Since Australia and the United Kingdom have similar levels of economic liberty, some people speculate the divergence we’re seeing has a lot to do with regional economic performance. That makes some sense. Many of Australia’s trading partners are fast-growing nations in East Asia. More specifically, those countries have been buying a lot of natural resources from Australian producers. The United Kingdom, by contrast, has a lot of trade with Europe’s slow-growing nations. The above chart is based on household disposable income. So I decided to also check the Maddison database to see whether there were similar changes to per-capita GDP. The charts don’t match exactly, but the trends are similar (I added the Czech Republic since it was mentioned in the tweet).
So is this the end of the story? Not exactly. My next step was to add Switzerland to see whether trade with Europe dooms a nation to divergence. Lo and behold, it is diverging with Australia, but in a positive way. It’s getting comparatively richer over time, just the opposite of what we see in the United Kingdom.
So maybe the real lesson is that there’s more prosperity – and the right kind of divergence – in nations with greater levels of economic liberty. And Switzerland surely is a good role model for policy.
I’ll close with a couple of caveats. The level of economic liberty is important, but it does not tell us everything. Likewise, the level of growth in neighboring nations is important, but it does not tell us everything. Moreover, I normally like looking at four or five decades of data rather than just 20 years. All that being said, I’m definitely not optimistic about the long-run outlook in the United Kingdom.
Source: International Liberty
Author
Daniel Mitchell is Chairman of the Center for Freedom and Prosperity.
View all posts
The views expressed on austriancenter.com are not necessarily those of the Austrian Economics Center.
Do you like the article?
We are glad you do! Please consider donating if you want to read more articles like this one.
Related
Comment
The Month That Was – May 2015
June 2nd, 2015
Comment
Markets Provide Care for an Aging Population
March 5th, 2018
Comment
An Initial Market Outlook for 2017: Part I
January 12th, 2017
Comment
The Gender Pay Gap Is Misleading
March 9th, 2020
Comment
Iraq – Again?
June 23rd, 2014