
Image by © Dreamstime
by Nicolas Cachanosky
In the last recent years, the idea of NGDP Targeting as a better, if not the optimal, target for central banks has received special attention. Surely the idea is not new, but the recent increase in interest is hard to deny. The idea is that the central bank should not target an interest rate, like the Fed Funds rate in the U.S. or the price level, but Nominal Gross Domestic Product (NGDP.) The idea is quite simple and straightforward. If there is monetary equilibrium, arguably what any central bank should aim to achieve, then nominal income (per capita) becomes stable.
The connection between monetary equilibrium and NGDP comes from the quantitative theory of money: MV = Py where M is money supply, V is money velocity or the inverse of money demand, P is the price level, and y is real GDP. If money is a good, it then follows that there is a demand and a supply.
Continue reading…
The views expressed on austriancenter.com are not necessarily those of the Austrian Economics Center.
We are glad you do! Please consider donating if you want to read more articles like this one.
Comment
|
December 5th, 2014
Does monetary equilibrium equal NGDP targeting?
by Nicolas Cachanosky In the last recent years, the idea […]
Author
Team AECImage by © Dreamstime
by Nicolas Cachanosky
In the last recent years, the idea of NGDP Targeting as a better, if not the optimal, target for central banks has received special attention. Surely the idea is not new, but the recent increase in interest is hard to deny. The idea is that the central bank should not target an interest rate, like the Fed Funds rate in the U.S. or the price level, but Nominal Gross Domestic Product (NGDP.) The idea is quite simple and straightforward. If there is monetary equilibrium, arguably what any central bank should aim to achieve, then nominal income (per capita) becomes stable.
The connection between monetary equilibrium and NGDP comes from the quantitative theory of money: MV = Py where M is money supply, V is money velocity or the inverse of money demand, P is the price level, and y is real GDP. If money is a good, it then follows that there is a demand and a supply.
Continue reading…
Author
View all posts
The views expressed on austriancenter.com are not necessarily those of the Austrian Economics Center.
Do you like the article?
We are glad you do! Please consider donating if you want to read more articles like this one.
Related
Comment
Krugman on Friedman, Hayek, and Liquidationism
August 19th, 2013
Comment
Being an Austrian Is Easier Than Ever
December 17th, 2013
Comment
A Christian country? No, a conservative one
June 6th, 2014
Comment
The ‘Nudge’ that Separated Families
October 17th, 2017
Comment
Inventing European Identity
July 23rd, 2019