During the 2013 elections in Albania, the Socialist Party candidate for Prime Minister, Edi Rama, won many votes simply because he promised to reform the health care system by making it “free.” But while boasting about this idea a lot, when in office, the policy was never implemented. “Free” health care instead became an unachievable dream for Prime Minister Rama and his ruling Socialist party. The economic situation, i.e., the hard, non-utopian reality, didn’t leave space for the implementation of such a system. Now, almost six years later, the case for universal health care in Albania is even harder to make.
Government-provided health care has become the norm in most Western countries. And in recent years, even in the United States, prominent politicians in the Democratic Party have pushed a similar agenda. In many cases, these politicians surely know that proposing such a system is utopian, and instead use it to garner more votes from the people. According to a projection, the health care proposals by Bernie Sanders would cost about $33 trillion in America, whose annual GDP is about $19.4 trillion.
Still, in countries like Albania, “free” health care is even further apart from reality. First of all, Albania is still in a transition phase. We have been a communist country for about 50 years and, now, 30 years later, we haven’t created the capital which would be needed for government-sponsored health care. We would have a large absence of well-educated medical staff, and there would surely be more corruption, as even more new bureaucracies would come into being – after all, corruption is already a problem here. It is rather unlikely that the health care system will suddenly be an exception.
Needless to say, “free” health care is not really free. Someone always has to pay for it, and it will be costly. In the case of emerging economies like Albania, this would be a major issue, as it would be difficult to sustain such a system. A big number of businesses could go bankrupt, many of them would cut jobs, or wouldn’t be able to invest more.
The assumption that a centralized attempt on such an important issue as health could work can only be seen as another example of a “pretense of knowledge” on the part of politicians. The last thing that a country like Albania needs is a government, which has failed on every turn in its tenure, to now even have its hands on the health care system.
Instead of extending its power and seizing ever more aspects of society and economy for themselves, politicians should leave, as far as possible, these very aspects alone and for the people to decide over for themselves. Indeed, while it maybe has never come to the Albanian governments’ mind, the free market and economic liberalism could help us to have cheaper – and better – health care, after all.
Eden Kollçinaku is an undergraduate student at University of New York Tirana, majoring in Computer Science. He wants to promote his libertarian views to large audience by founding a non-profit organization in order to contribute to economic education.
Comment
|
April 23rd, 2019
“Free” Health Care Is the Wrong Path for Albania
by Eden Kollçinaku
During the 2013 elections in Albania, the Socialist Party candidate for Prime Minister, Edi Rama, won many votes simply because he promised to reform the health care system by making it “free.” But while boasting about this idea a lot, when in office, the policy was never implemented. “Free” health care instead became an unachievable dream for Prime Minister Rama and his ruling Socialist party. The economic situation, i.e., the hard, non-utopian reality, didn’t leave space for the implementation of such a system. Now, almost six years later, the case for universal health care in Albania is even harder to make.
Government-provided health care has become the norm in most Western countries. And in recent years, even in the United States, prominent politicians in the Democratic Party have pushed a similar agenda. In many cases, these politicians surely know that proposing such a system is utopian, and instead use it to garner more votes from the people. According to a projection, the health care proposals by Bernie Sanders would cost about $33 trillion in America, whose annual GDP is about $19.4 trillion.
Still, in countries like Albania, “free” health care is even further apart from reality. First of all, Albania is still in a transition phase. We have been a communist country for about 50 years and, now, 30 years later, we haven’t created the capital which would be needed for government-sponsored health care. We would have a large absence of well-educated medical staff, and there would surely be more corruption, as even more new bureaucracies would come into being – after all, corruption is already a problem here. It is rather unlikely that the health care system will suddenly be an exception.
Needless to say, “free” health care is not really free. Someone always has to pay for it, and it will be costly. In the case of emerging economies like Albania, this would be a major issue, as it would be difficult to sustain such a system. A big number of businesses could go bankrupt, many of them would cut jobs, or wouldn’t be able to invest more.
The assumption that a centralized attempt on such an important issue as health could work can only be seen as another example of a “pretense of knowledge” on the part of politicians. The last thing that a country like Albania needs is a government, which has failed on every turn in its tenure, to now even have its hands on the health care system.
Instead of extending its power and seizing ever more aspects of society and economy for themselves, politicians should leave, as far as possible, these very aspects alone and for the people to decide over for themselves. Indeed, while it maybe has never come to the Albanian governments’ mind, the free market and economic liberalism could help us to have cheaper – and better – health care, after all.
Eden Kollçinaku is an undergraduate student at University of New York Tirana, majoring in Computer Science. He wants to promote his libertarian views to large audience by founding a non-profit organization in order to contribute to economic education.
Author
View all posts
The views expressed on austriancenter.com are not necessarily those of the Austrian Economics Center.
Do you like the article?
We are glad you do! Please consider donating if you want to read more articles like this one.
Related
Comment
Carl Menger: A Biographical Appreciation by Friedrich von Wieser
February 27th, 2019
Comment
At the Dawn of 2016: Where the Credit Cycle Meets Geopolitical Tensions and the Earnings Yield
January 11th, 2016
Comment
Struggling for Liberty: Czechoslovakia Yesterday, Hong Kong Today
September 11th, 2020
Comment
The Post-Bubble Dream and Collateral Holes: Voltaire Reviews the Iranian Deal
November 28th, 2013
Comment
5 Reasons Marxism Has Nothing to Offer Millennials
August 25th, 2017